The Why? Movement
Contact us through Facebook, Twitter, or Email
  • About
    • Board
    • Code of Ethics
    • Community Partners
    • Frequently-Asked Questions
  • Calendar
    • Past Events
  • Programs and Services
  • Blogs
    • Question It!
    • "Why don't we...?"
    • Why? Questions in the News
  • Support The Why? Movement
    • Donate
    • Official Merchandise >
      • Society6 Store
      • Zazzle Store
    • Official Membership

Why isn't "conversion therapy" a form of child abuse?

6/12/2014

0 Comments

 
The Federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act defines "child abuse" as 
"Any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse or exploitation"

or


"An act or failure to act which presents an imminent risk of serious harm."
The American Psychological Association, in its fact sheet on homosexuality and sexual orientation, stresses that "all major national mental health organizations have officially expressed concerns" about conversion (aka "reparative") therapy. The American Psychological Association not only explies that there is no evidence that such "therapy" is safe or effective, but it also suggests that such practices likely harm lesbian, gay, and bisexual people by creating hostile environments for them.

Alan Chambers, the former President of Exodus International (which promotes itself as "the oldest and largest Christian ministry dealing with faith and homosexuality") has publicly apologized to the gay community for what he described as "years of undue suffering and judgment" resulting from Exodus efforts to "cure" people of their homosexuality (using a strategy that he admits is 99% ineffective).

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has unanimously upheld California's ban on gay conversion therapy on the grounds of the apparent danger it presents, especially to children. This court's line of thinking is not dissimilar to that of New Jersey assemblyman Tim Eustice, who qualified it as "an insidious form of child abuse" when championing a bill to have the practice banned in his state. 

Given that the Psychological community, significant elements of both the Federal and State governments, and even conversion "therapy" insiders have qualified this practice as harmful, why shouldn't Congress amend the Federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to explicitly outlaw conversion therapy for children?

Why wouldn't outlawing conversion therapy for children make sense, given that the Federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act already outlaws behaviors that carry the risk of "serious physical or emotional harm" to children? 

Click here if you'd like information about contacting your Representatives and Senators to ask them this question.

 

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    July 2016
    December 2014
    November 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

    About these Editorials

    These editorials are written by The Why? Movement's staff and affiliates for the purpose of challenging people to think critically.

    One should not interpret the questions these editorials raise as statements of
    The Why? Movement's official position on the topics under discussion.

    As a 501(c)(3) organization, we respect and follow all laws concerning
    Educational Organizations.

    Picture

    Categories

    All
    Authoritarianism
    Child Abuse
    Civil Rights
    Confederate Flag
    Culture
    Elections
    Espionage
    Gay Rights
    Gun Control
    History
    Naivety
    Politics
    Racism
    Republican Party
    Responsible Gun Ownership
    Russia
    Subversion
    Third Parties

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly