The Why? Movement
Contact us through Facebook, Twitter, or Email
  • About
    • Board
    • Code of Ethics
    • Community Partners
    • Frequently-Asked Questions
  • Calendar
    • Past Events
  • Programs and Services
  • Blogs
    • Question It!
    • "Why don't we...?"
    • Why? Questions in the News
  • Support The Why? Movement
    • Donate
    • Official Merchandise >
      • Society6 Store
      • Zazzle Store
    • Official Membership

Why do so many public schools still lock students with disabilities into seclusion?

11/1/2014

0 Comments

 

Originally posted at Huffington Post Education:

Picture

State laws restricting schools' use of restraint and seclusion probably do little to help students with disabilities, University of New Hampshire researchers say.

Many U.S. school districts use restraint and seclusion as discipline, and the punishments disproportionately affect students with disabilities, according to the research paper published Tuesday. States have taken steps to curb these disciplinary practices in recent years, yet students with disabilities continue to be secluded and restrained the same amount, the University of New Hampshire scholars wrote.

Restraint and seclusion were used about 267,000 times during the 2011-2012 school year -- 75 percent of the time on students with disabilities, according to U.S. Department of Education data released in March. In a school setting, restraint is defined as constraining a student’s movement by physical or mechanical means. Seclusion separates a student from peers to be put into isolation.

About half of states updated policies on restraint and seclusion between the 2009–2010 school year and 2011–2012. But students with disabilities continued to receive the punishments at the same rate after the changes, according to the paper. “We can’t say that state law doesn’t do anything, but we don’t have any evidence that would refute that,” Douglas Gagnon, co-author of the paper, told The Huffington Post.

Gagnon, a recent PhD recipient who wrote the paper with professors Vincent Connolly and Marybeth J. Mattingly, said it's hard to generalize about states' updates to seclusion and restraint. But “it is fair to say the changes have been more restrictive,” he said.

“For instance, several states limited the situations where restraint and seclusion could be used, only using it in emergency situations when all other means are exhausted,” said Gagnon.

Most of the variation in reported use of restraint and seclusion happens within states, as shown in this map:

Picture
“Implementation rests at the hands of localities,” said Gagnon. “Although this can't be proved based on our data whatsoever, I suspect that if one wanted to change the way these are being used in schools, you might get a bit more traction if you’re supplying practitioners with support and skills and alternatives.”

Restraint and seclusion tend to happen more in urban school districts than in suburban and rural areas, according to the paper. The practices are slightly more likely to occur in low-poverty, low-minority districts. Gagnon speculated that this may be due to variations in reporting, or that low-poverty districts may have resources like seclusion rooms.

Gagnon stressed that seclusion and restraint are common in only a “small but meaningful minority of districts.”

He asked: “We know that it can be dangerous to use [these practices], and with places using it frequently, what are they getting out of it?”

A 2009 report from the Government Accountability Office reported 20 cases of students dying after being subjected to extreme cases of seclusion and restraint.
0 Comments
    Important Note:
    The Why? Movement does not endorse the opinions expressed in this blog's republished articles and op-eds; it merely endorses the asking of the questions these articles' and op-eds' titles pose.

    The Why? Movement encourages readers to form and comment with their own answers to "why?" questions, especially when writers proffer answers to the questions they've posed in their articles' or op-eds' titles.

    Sources for Articles:
    • Google News Feed
    • Twitter News Search
    Recent Articles:
    • Why can't we vote on our smartphones?
    • Why do voters believe lies?
    • Why Isn't the Improving Economy Helping Democrats?
    • Why are Rap lyrics being used as evidence in court?
    • Why is the Republican Governor of Alaska keeping sexual assault scandal records secret?
    • Why is it so hard to prove that helmets make cycling safe?
    • Why do so many public schools still lock students with disabilities into seclusion?

    Archives:

    November 2014
    October 2014

    Categories:

    All
    Alaska
    Bicycling
    Culture
    Democratic Party
    Economy
    Education
    Elections
    Freedom Of Speech
    Hip-Hop
    Humanitarianism
    Justice
    Midterms
    Music
    Police
    Politics
    Polls
    Psychology
    Public Schools
    Racism
    Republican Party
    Safety
    Scandal
    Sexual Assault
    Students With Disabilities
    Technology
    Transparancy
    United Nations
    Voting

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly